Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 21 Next »

1st August 2023 release

Summary

The retraining process resulted in a new models, one for PD and one for 7day price forecast. After considerable experimentation we retrained the price forecasting models with a considerable increase in performance of approximately 50%.

Training

  • Both PD and 7day price forecast models were trained on data between 01-10-2020 and 20-08-2023.

    • The market suspension period and a period after the Callide explosion were removed from the training data.

New features (input data) exceptions

  • A new “recent prices feature” was added to give the model some context for the current pricing environment. This feature is the median price for a window around the forecast time for the most recent three days. For example, for a forecast occurring in 2 days at 11am, the model generated the median value for prices between 10am-12pm for the three days before the forecast was run.

  • A number of additional experiments were conducted on the 7 day forecast model, with the major modifications including:

    • The 50th percent probability of demand features were augmented with 10th percent probability of demand data

    • The new recent prices features mentioned previously

    • A new time of day feature

    • A new weekday/weekend feature.

Experimentation results

Retraining experimentation list, results and model selection. Includes README worksheet, feature variables, training period, validation period and benchmarking results.

Previous release history

6th June 2023

Summary

The current model was trained using data up until 30th March 2023. Retraining the model included a months data after the retirement of Liddell. We also conducted many experiments by changing the feature set (input variables) as well as boosting (weighting) more recent training periods.

Much to our surprise the performance of all retrained and new models demonstrated that the original model either performed better or more or less equal to all new models when measured against the validation set (which was a week of recent data not used in the training set). As a result we felt it best to keep the current model. Therefore we did not change the model as scheduled for the 6th of June.

Why retraining did not result in a better model (for 6th June)

There are a number of reasons why the original model performed better than all other retrained models however we believe that the this was due to the volatile market dynamics post Liddell retirement and that the market behaviour has since settled. Models that included the weeks after the retirement of Liddell are less representative of current market dynamics and now overstate forecast prices relative to actual market outcomes.


  • No labels